Comparison of the Average Weather in Curitiba, Port Elizabeth, and Fandrandava on September 26

Average Temperature on September 26

Average Temperature on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM54°F56°F58°F60°F62°F64°F66°F68°F70°F72°F74°FPort ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
The hourly average air temperature at 2 m above the ground.

Curitiba

Temperature Bands on September 26 at Curitibanightdaynight12 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0%100%20%80%40%60%60%40%80%20%100%0%coldcoolcomfortablewarm

Port Elizabeth

Temperature Bands on September 26 at Port Elizabethnightdaynight12 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0%100%20%80%40%60%60%40%80%20%100%0%coldcoolcomfortablewarm

Fandrandava

Temperature Bands on September 26 at Fandrandavanightdaynight12 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0%100%20%80%40%60%60%40%80%20%100%0%coldcoolcomfortablewarm
frigid 15°F freezing 32°F very cold 45°F cold 55°F cool 65°F comfortable 75°F warm 85°F hot 95°F sweltering
The average hourly temperature, color coded into bands. The shaded overlays indicate night and civil twilight.

Chance of Clearer Skies on September 26

Chance of Clearer Skies on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Port ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
The percentage of time the sky is clear, mostly clear, or partly cloudy (i.e., less than 60% of the sky is covered by clouds).

Hourly Share of Precipitation on September 26

Hourly Share of Precipitation on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%4.2%4.2%Port ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
The share of the day's precipitation attributable to each hour of the day, excluding trace quantities.

Solar Elevation on September 26

Solar Elevation on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM-80 deg-60 deg-40 deg-20 deg0 deg20 deg40 deg60 deg80 degPort ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
Elevation of the center of the Sun above (positive) or below (negative) the horizon.

Chance of Muggy Conditions on September 26

Chance of Muggy Conditions on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Port ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
The percentage of time that is muggy, oppressive, or miserable (i.e., a dew point greater than 65°F).

Average Wind Speed on September 26

Average Wind Speed on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0 mph2 mph4 mph6 mph8 mph10 mph12 mph14 mph16 mph18 mphPort ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
The average of mean hourly wind speeds at 10 meters above the ground.

Average Daily Incident Shortwave Solar Energy on September 26

Average Daily Incident Shortwave Solar Energy on September 2612 AM3 AM6 AM9 AM12 PM3 PM6 PM9 PM12 AM0.0 kW0.2 kW0.4 kW0.6 kW0.8 kW1.0 kW1.2 kW1.4 kW1.6 kW1.8 kW2.0 kWPort ElizabethPort ElizabethCuritibaCuritibaFandrandavaFandrandava
Average incident shortwave solar power reaching the ground per square meter.

Data Sources

This report illustrates the typical weather for Curitiba, Port Elizabeth, and Fandrandava, based on a statistical analysis of historical hourly weather reports and model reconstructions from January 1, 1980 to December 31, 2016.

The details of the data sources used on this page vary between places and are discussed in detail on each place's dedicated page:

Disclaimer

The information on this site is provided as is, without any assurances as to its accuracy or suitability for any purpose. Weather data is prone to errors, outages, and other defects. We assume no responsibility for any decisions made on the basis of the content presented on this site.

We draw particular cautious attention to our reliance on the MERRA-2 model-based reconstructions for a number of important data series. While having the tremendous advantages of temporal and spatial completeness, these reconstructions: (1) are based on computer models that may have model-based errors, (2) are coarsely sampled on a 50 km grid and are therefore unable to reconstruct the local variations of many microclimates, and (3) have particular difficulty with the weather in some coastal areas, especially small islands.

We further caution that our travel scores are only as good as the data that underpin them, that weather conditions at any given location and time are unpredictable and variable, and that the definition of the scores reflects a particular set of preferences that may not agree with those of any particular reader.